INternational Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences

Vol 3 Issue 2 July - december 2008


Copyright © 2008 International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences (IJCJS)   ISSN: 0973-5089 Vol 3 (2): 84–109

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This license does not permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without specific permission.

 

Identification of Potential Terrorism:

The problem and implications for Law-enforcement in Pakistan

 

Fasihuddin[1]

NWFP Police and Pakistan Society of Criminology, Pakistan

 

Abstract

In South Asia, Pakistan is in a situation to prevent the growth of terrorist activities. In this context we need to identify and define certain important components of terrorism and some worth mentioning characteristics of terrorists which have greater imperative of the new phenomenon of globalization of terrorism. The immediate effects of all terrorist activities are felt and dealt at a local level by the native LEAs and other institutions responsible for disaster management. We know that there are definitional difficulties in explaining what terrorism is, however, lack of the constraints of definitional consensus doesn’t mean that common characteristics of terrorist activities within the existing definitions of terrorism don’t exist. This applies to all kinds of terrorism, the list of which is generally found in every relevant literature. The present paper is an attempt to identify the potential terrorist activities in Pakistan from policing perspective and analyses the problems and implications for Law enforcement. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Key Words: Terrorism; Law Enforcement; Pakistan; Terrorists; Victims.

 

Introduction

(A)       Knowledge-Based Management and Terrorism – Conceptual Understanding

    Knowledge is an important organizational resource. Unlike other inert organizational resources, the application of existing knowledge has the potential of generating new knowledge. Once created, knowledge can be articulated, shared, stored, and re-contextualized to yield options for the future. Organizations, in the modern day, are turning to knowledge management initiatives and technologies to leverage their knowledge resources. Knowledge-management is seen as a systematic and organizationally specified process for acquiring, organizing, and communicating knowledge of employees i.e., knowledge workers, so that other employees may make use of it to be more effective and productive in their work (Gottschalk, 2007). However, the law-enforcement agencies (LEAs), especially the police, have two basic tasks: the generation of police knowledge (which refers primarily to the conclusions and understandings reached by the LEAs as to what crimes have been (or are likely to be) committed, by whom, how, and why), and the production of evidence (which refers to the material that may be presented in the court to help establish that whether an alleged criminal offence has been committed). Numerous factors, like host of information sources, stereotypes, prejudices, methods, care, and skills can play a part in shaping this knowledge and evidence production processes. One of the branches of LEAs and especially the police work that seems extremely knowledge intensive is police intelligence, the challenging part of which is the identification of potential criminals i.e., proactive intelligence or preventive intelligence or threat assessment. Gottschalk quotes Lahneman, that intelligence agencies were the world’s first knowledge companies (Gottschalk, 2007).

    The key to this knowledge-based management is the conceptual clarity of what one is concerned about, i.e., the proper acquisition of knowledge related to problem-identification. By this we mean the correct form of knowledge which is preceded by information, data collection and analysis and followed by dissemination and policy options. Law-enforcement officers spend years studying criminal behaviours in order to prevent crimes and to capture and prosecute criminals. Public safety roles for LEAs now require the use of some of these same skills in identifying the criminal behaviours of potential terrorists. As noted by Haffman (1998) and others, the most difficult and critical component of homeland security is to recognize and prevent a terrorist attack (Shusta et al., 2008).

In view of the above academic discussion which has remarkable implication for policy–options and response strategies in law-enforcement, we need to identify and define certain important components of terrorism and some worth mentioning characteristics of terrorists which have greater imperative of the new phenomenon of globalization of terrorism. The immediate effects of all terrorist activities are felt and dealt at a local level by the native LEAs and other institutions responsible for disaster management. We know that there are definitional difficulties in explaining what terrorism is, however, lack of the constraints of definitional consensus doesn’t mean that common characteristics of terrorist activities within the existing definitions of terrorism don’t exist. This applies to all kinds of terrorism, the list of which is generally found in every relevant literature. Schmidt surveyed 100 scholars and researchers regarding their definition of terrorism and found certain common elements in them with some major characteristics of all kinds of terrorism (Birzer & Roberson, 2007).

    Martin (2004) has pointed out certain hypothesis on the basis of empirical findings vis-à-vis terrorism and Schmalleger (2007) quoting Nettler has given six characteristics of all types of terrorism. Apart from commonalty in goals and modus operandi, terrorists are inspired by many and diverse motives which can be classified distinctly in three categories: rational, psychological, and cultural. Many combinations and variations of these factors may shape a terrorist (Simonsen & Spindlove, 2007). Not all terrorists share the same motivation. The US academic circles generally describe two kinds of terrorism: domestic and international. However, the Washington, D.C. based Council on Foreign Relations offers a typology of terrorism consisting of six types of terrorism (Schmalleger, 2006).

    For a better conceptual understanding of terrorism by the LEAs, Table-I provides ample of guidance to would–be knowledge–workers of law-enforcement officers in comprehending, preventing, assessing and managing terrorist activities which otherwise had never been their primary concern until the deadly attacks of 9/11. Obviously, the enhanced demands from the LEAs have given rise to certain questions in terms of civil liberties, human rights, increased capacity-building and the limit and scope of the authority of various LEAs (Ormtemeire, 2006). It is basically the acquisition of this fundamental knowledge that guide the LEAs in their counterterrorism strategies, whether short-term or long-term and whether event-specific or a generalized warning system. This obviously puts stress on the people and resources of all LEAs, especially the police. Careful studying of the traits, history and characteristics of a terrorist, the features of a terrorist attack, the way an incident is prevented, managed or investigated and the manner in which security and safety of the public is secured in the aftermath of a terrorist activity, are all important elements for shaping an organizational structure and re-defining the role of law-enforcement in any given system. A kind of comparative research will enable us to look at the core knowledge in our native places because, as stated above, the immediate effects of all terrorist activities are local in nature. Like every criminal activity, a terrorist act is characterized by and dealt with in the same routine process of law-enforcement. However, new concepts and approaches are regularly being evolved for more comprehensive and targeted results, mostly adopted and adapted in the light of constantly changing dynamics of international terrorism. The core knowledge on terrorism will help the LEAs bring a change in the desired direction. This is what we mean by conceptual understanding and knowledge-based management of terrorism.

 

Table I: Basic Knowledge about Terrorism, Terrorists and TGs

 

Identifying Common Elements of Terrorist Groups (TGs)

◙ The meaning of terrorism derives from the target or victim

◙ Terrorist Groups (TGs) adapt as times change

◙ Majority of TGs are unsuccessful in their long-term goals

◙ TGs network and pool resources

◙ TGs work with other organizations, including organized crime groups, to finance activities and mobilize resources

◙ TGs are creative in their tactics and leave open the possibility that  anything can happen

Identifying Six Common Characteristics of All Terrorist Activities

No Rule: There are no moral limitations on the type or degree of violence that terrorists can use.

No Innocents: No distinctions are made between soldiers and civilians. Children can be killed as easily as adults.

Economy: Kill one, frighten 10,000

Publicity: Terrorists seek publicity, and publicity encourages terrorism.

Meaning: Terrorist acts give meaning and significance to the lives of terrorists.

No Clarity: Beyond the immediate aim of destructive acts, the long-term goals of terrorists are likely to be poorly conceived or impossible to implement. Terrorism that succeeds escalates (Schmalleger, 2007).

Identifying Common Qualities of Terrorists

◙ Must believe passionately in the justness of their cause.

◙ Must possess a “killer instinct”.

◙ Must possess an ability to act effectively as a loner (60 % cases).

◙ Must have a very  high degree of physical courage

   (Simonsen & Spindlove, 2007).

Identifying Common Hypotheses underlying Terrorism

◙ Usually planned, instrumental, purposeful, politically motivated, and premeditated.

◙ Fundamentally a psychological warfare to generate irrational and emotional response.

◙ Derives advantage of personal freedom and civil liberties in a democratic system.

◙ Capitalizes on fresh recruitment from next generations.

◙ It is a perennial, ceaseless struggle with its adaptability to adjust to challenges and countermeasures

Identification of Types of Terrorist Groups

◙ Nationalist (Kurdistan Workers’ Party, IRA)

◙ Religious (Al-Qaeda, Hamas)

◙ State-Sponsored (Hezbollah backed by Iran)

◙ Left-Wing (Red Brigades (Italy)

◙ Right-Wing  (Neo-Nazis)

◙ Anarchist (anti-globalization groups)

  

(B)              Stages of a Terrorist Attack in Law-Enforcement

 

     Like all criminal activity, a terrorist attack ought to be prevented before it happens, but we know that terrorist attacks could never be stopped completely by any nation or force, even though effective preventive intelligence played a significant role in reducing the number of activities and minimizing their damaging effects. The routine process of investigation and prosecution of a terrorist attack is similar to other violent or ordinary crimes. However, the emerging phenomenon of police intelligence, intelligence analysis, risk-analysis or intelligence-driven policing (IDP) or intelligence-led policing (ILD) has added a new dimension to the overall counterterrorism or post-attack response of LEAs. This process is outlined in diagram No. I.

    Preventive intelligence is not counterterrorism; it is only awareness and is an indispensable element in the identification and investigation of terrorist activity. Federal, state, and urban police agencies usually provide local police agencies with intelligence data on persons and groups having a serious potential for future criminal involvement in acts of terrorism. Preventive intelligence is a focused inquiry. The intelligence operations, thus suggested in the light of such inquiry may include informants (paid or unpaid), police undercover agents and various surveillance techniques. However, legal standards must be considered before preventive intelligence operations can be initiated. The nature of the existing grounds for suspicion must be examined in relation to the anticipated or past terrorist activity (Weston & Lushbaugh, 2006). Good intelligence is rarely produced solely from one-off ‘tips’ from informants. Rather, it emerges from a long-term process of incrementally increasing knowledge which is a continued effort and may be triggered by a vague report or by rumours about a criminal enterprise about which little is currently known (John & Maguire, 2007).

 

 

(B)              Intelligence-Led Policing (ILD) and Potential Terrorism

     Many reasons and factors that account for an increased interest in ILD are enumerated by academics and practitioners, e.g.:

  • Perceived ineffectiveness of reactive policing

  • Limitations of interviewing and confession evidence

  • Advances in technology

  • Increased focus on serious and organized crime and

  • Pressure on efficient and effective use of resources, etc.,

The basic elements of ILD revolve around the crime, the criminal, the community and the context (4Cs). It oscillates from one element to another with the sole aim of reducing the actual or potential threats of terrorism. Intelligence is the information that has been analyzed and integrated into a useful perspective.

The information used in the development of effective intelligence is typically gathered from many sources, such as newspaper, surveillance, covert operations, financial records, electronic eavesdropping, interviews, the Internet, and interrogations. Law-enforcement intelligence or criminal intelligence is the result of a ‘process that evaluates information collected from diverse sources, integrates the relevant information into a cohesive package, and produces a conclusion or estimate about criminal phenomenon by using a scientific approach to problem solving. Carter describes two forms of criminal intelligence:

1) Tactical Intelligence which, “includes gaining or developing information related to threats of terrorism or crime and using this information to apprehend offenders, harden targets, and use strategies that will eliminate or mitigate the threats”.

 2) Strategic Intelligence which, in contrast, “provides information to decision makers about the changing nature of threats for the purpose of developing response strategies and reallocating resources to accomplish effective prevention” (Schmalleger, 2008).

    The 4Cs work in a composite whole, which are in constant interactive processes in the minds and hands of the knowledge workers of LEAs. From crime trends and patterns, the LEAs people anticipate and recognize potential or actual perpetrators and the community where they operate or whom they affect. The context is related to wider social, economic and cultural factors that may impact the levels of crime and patterns of offending (Diagram No. II).

 

    As a result of this interdependence and interplay of the information derived, assessed and analysed, both clockwise and anticlockwise, in the analytical and critical minds of LEAs, certain intelligence products are produced by the analysts, which helps facilitates accurate prioritization and effective response decisions. We are compelled to borrow the nine analytical intelligence products of the National Intelligence Model (NIM) which was first piloted in UK in 2000 by the National Criminal Intelligence Service (John & Maguire, 2007). The interested parties could develop their own model on somewhat similar pattern. This is not an exhaustive measure and the writer has tabulated the products for a brief and easy understanding (Table: II).

 

Table II: Developing a Native Model on Criminal Intelligence

 

Name of Intelligence Product

Description and Identification

1- Crime Pattern Analysis

Crime series, crime trends, hotspots, general profiles of the criminals/terrorists.

2- Market Profile

Details of criminal markets – key factors, networks, criminal assets and associated criminal trends.

3- Demographic/Social Trend Analysis

Long-term predictions of future demands on LEAs+ In depth analysis of social factors underlying crime /terrorism + identification of fluctuation in criminal / terrorist activities.

4- Criminal Business Profile

Criminal modus operandi, selection of victims + methods of disposing and removing the proceeds + weaknesses in the systems and procedures which the terrorists exploit + identification of legislative or policy needs.

5- Network Analysis

Complete breakdown of the individuals and activities that comprise an identifiable criminal network + guidance for strategic planning and tactical operational decisions.

6- Risk Analysis

Identification of risks posed by criminal individuals/terrorists/TGs to the public, to individual victims or categories of victims or the LEAs.

7- Target Profile Analysis

Complete picture of the activities, associations and lifestyles of individuals identified as high-value targets + includes a breakdown of techniques that have worked or failed against the target meriting special attention.

8- Operational Intelligence Assessment

Constant assessment of ongoing operations and consequently the generation of new intelligence about associates or activities.

9- Results Analysis

Assessment of the impact of the responses adopted which is used to identify ‘what works’ and to disseminate good practices.

  

(B)              Identification of Terrorist Groups in Pakistan

    Pakistan is a multicultural, multilingual and semi democratic society. However, more than 160 million Pakistanis have seen many social, political and religious movements and unrest since its independence in 1947. Ethnic groups and political non-accommodation led to its dismemberment in 1971, when Bangladesh (East Pakistan) got separated from its West wing, the present Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Ethnicity still has its insidious venom in the metropolitan city of Karachi. Political disturbance and unrest amongst the local tribal associations and parties in the Province of Baluchistan have a long history of political disharmony and armed conflict with the federal law-enforcement agencies since the 1970s and with an upsurge in the current decade. Sectarian turbulence and target killings of rival religious groups, the Shias and the Sunnis with their motivated young militants (gangs) have left the worst scars on its political system. In the background of this bleak picture and history of intolerance, non-accommodation, religious animosities, ethnic frictions, political turmoil and continuous breaking and wrecking of social and political institutions, the would-be terrorists find Pakistan a safe haven for their acrimonious activities.

    However, the most terrible situation arose when Pakistan joined the ‘war on terror’ after 9/11 and withdrew its support for the Taliban government in Afghanistan. The Taliban got dismantled politically but have made a tactical retreat and resorted to guerrilla tactics against the NATO/ISAF forces in Afghanistan with a considerable displacement towards and inside the adjacent Pakistani tribal areas known as FATA (Federally Administered Tribal Areas).  Pakistan, as a committed ally in the war on terror and as a first line country, has deployed more than 90,000 forces on its western frontier to siege and search the Al-Qaeda militants who are gradually making inroads in the contagious territories and now in the settled districts of the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) and the Province of Baluchistan. Taliban is rather a misnomer for all the Al-Qaeda militants/terrorists. Taliban, the students of Islamic schools, are wrongly mixed up with the Taliban of Afghanistan who are highly trained, motivated and committed to the cause of taking out the Allied Forces from their native land of Afghanistan. The Taliban insurgency in the settled districts of Pakistan is a different phenomenon, which demands a true Islamic polity and the imposition of Islamic laws (Sharia) in the country. As far as the Taliban in the tribal areas are concerned, they are aware of the rugged terrain and have socio-tribal cohesion in their attitude towards the ‘war on terror’. They have inflicted huge losses on the LEAs, killing more than 1000 security personnel and a 100 of pro-government tribal chieftains, called ‘Malik’. The government has entered into a political dialogue with these militants in FATA and struck a few periodic peace agreements with them but due to the United States, uneasiness with these agreements and due to the mutual distrust amongst the parties, the political solutions failed to bring peace in the territory. This is one of the most tragic developments in the history of war and peace where political accords could not bring tranquility and peace to an area.

    Unfortunately, the LEAs, especially the Pakistani intelligence agencies lack thinking and analytical minds and tools to discern, differentiate, identify and classify meticulously the various kinds of typology and characteristics of each such group. We cannot formulate meaningful and effective policies unless we know the true nature, structure, development, history, organization, demands and modus operandi of all these groups which are loosely netted at the moment. The intelligence agencies’ failure to forewarn the LEAs about potential terrorist attacks before 9/11 has been a debate in the government and academic circles in the U.S. as well. Much has been written against America’s intelligence failure in the wake of the September 11 attacks and their insufficient attention to the activities of the suspicious people (Brener III, 2004). Some think that ‘the state security agents had been aware for years of the growing extremism and terrorism but nothing significant was done to mitigate or prevent violent confrontations such as the 9/11 attacks (Oliverio & Lauderdale, 2005). However, the reasons for this failure should be searched in non-professional, non-academic, unsystematic and superficial treatment by the LEAs and their analysts. A knowledge reservoir is the first key element in identifying, tracing, sensing and feeling of an underlying pathogenesis. The Taliban in Pakistan are now scattered and have engaged the LEAs at various flash points to which the UK Risk Assessment has given the name of ‘Neo-Taliban’ (The News International, February 6, 2008). The UK assessment has given an early warning that they can spread around the globe. All such reports and warning signals are of little policy value as most of the western think-tanks are not well-versed with the realities on ground and the lack of such conceptual understanding of the Taliban phenomenon has made the war on terror a losing battle for the Allies. The situation on the Pakistani side is also not promising and the same intellectual and analytical scarcity has made things difficult for the LEAs in identifying the various TGs and their scope, strength, strategies and survival (4Ss). To arrive at a conceptual clarity on the subject of Taliban terrorists, we have to identify their various kinds, activities and interdependence on fresh recruitment and other criminal gangs. Unfortunately, the LEAs with their intelligence wings have been a failure in handling the groups separately and to dissuade and deprive them from fresh and continuous inflow of material and resources from within and abroad. Mere speculation and elusive Information Reports (IRs) without empirical research, assessment and proper intelligence are of no use to the LEAs in their practical endeavours. There are no findings on the financial and material support of these groups. Conversely, accusations and allegations are in abundance and have not been put to serious intelligence analysis.

    Some foreign experts, officials and media analysts express their concern about a possible linkage of Taliban in FATA with the Muslims in Europe, who may be unhappy due to one or another reason like lack of job opportunities, problems of identity and immigration policies, etc. The Western media and situational-analysis reports of the U.S. think-tanks and other government departments are constantly engaged in throwing aspersions on a possible take over of Pakistani nuclear arsenals by the Taliban who, in their view, are rapidly growing, proliferating and gaining popularity in the country. Hardly a day passes by, when the local media don’t carry such reports and news items from abroad. The Pakistan government, from time to time, has expressed its concern over such reports. However, these reports are more political and diplomatic in nature, rather than being based on true and honest threat assessment. No authentic and verifiable linkages have been established by the critics and analysts amongst the local Taliban and their potential effects on the Muslims in Europe or the Taliban’s initiative of overthrowing the established national institutions. Some government officials express their concern and doubts about the possible interference by ‘foreign-hands’, ‘intelligence services of unfriendly countries’ and so on, but there is no verifiable or undeniable findings on this subject. If we can’t rule out the possibility, we have also not established the suspicion through solid evidence and proof. 

    For an ‘Early Warning’ episode, such reports may be taken as an alarm for the rising, preparation and sensitization of both sides. However, little impact has been observed on LEAs in their approaches and strategies towards potential terrorist attacks in the country. Such ‘warning bells’ have created little or virtually no change in the attitude and response of the LEAs to ascertain, assess, predict and prepare for any potential eventuality, provided any of the suspected/weak linkages are established beyond any doubt. The LEAs are still anachronistic, traditional, primitive ill-equipped, under-staffed, poorly paid and intellectually deficient of analytical vision and knowledge to predict and respond to potential threats of terrorism. A diagrammatic scheme of the actual and potential TGs is shown in Diagram No. III.

    Another important factor which has escaped the attention of the LEAs analysis is the dispersion, disintegration and displacement of the defunct sectarian violent and the militant organizations which were once instrumental in the Afghan war against the Soviet invasion, and their re-integration into fighting Taliban’s ranks. The LEAs can not be absolved from the charges of being incompetent to forestall and forewarn the potential re-emergence of defunct sectarian and militant organizations who find a safe haven in the shape of new banner holder against any foreign invasion. No doubt that the Islamic political parties have many Taliban sympathizers in their ranks but any strong evidence of financial or material support to them has not been presented. However, the directed or imperceptible indoctrination of young and tender minds with jihadi teachings in their Islamic schools, called Madrassahs, cannot be ruled out.  The symbiotic association of street criminals, drug pushers, poppy cultivators, arms dealers and other Taliban/terrorist groups should be a focus of extensive research study in identification of potential terrorism. It is briefly dealt in the subsequent section on Crime-Terror continuum.

 

(B)              Potential Terrorist Activities and Crime-Terror Continuum

     Makarenko (2003) has developed a hypothesis of ‘crime-terror continuum’ (CTC), which explains the relationship of the ‘crime-terror nexus’ in the contemporary security environment. It is called a ‘continuum’ because it may be used to trace past, current and the potential future evolution of organized crime and/or terrorism. It also alludes to the fact that a single group can slide up and down the scale depending on the environment in which it operates. The most instable and threatening point along the CTC is the fulcrum point, where criminal and political motivations simultaneously converge and are displayed in the actions of a single group (Makarenko, 2003). Though the ‘Convergence Thesis’ is a good linear transformation hypothesis of political organizations turning into criminal/terrorist groups, the difficulties of identifying such groups and predicting the exact time of such transformation and its precipitating factors are always a challenge to the security people who are required to be a step ahead of such triggering processes.

    Most criminal and terrorist groups in the security environment of post Cold War era have developed the capacity to engage in both criminal and terrorist activities. Criminal groups have increasingly engaged in the rising number of weak states, whereas the terrorist groups have increasingly focused on criminal activities to replace lost financial support form state sponsors (Makarenko, 2003). They live in symbiosis and in a state of interdependent equilibrium. They rely on each other’s capabilities, technical know-how, experiences, training, motivation, contacts and resources. The support of drug mafia and poppy-grower to the ruling Taliban in Afghanistan before 9/11 is still resonating in the academic and official circles. Same is the case in Pakistan where people involved in white-collar crimes, car-snatching, serial killing, vehicle theft, drugs pushing, kidnapping, chronic non-payment of taxes, arms dealing, smuggling of non-custom paid vehicles, etc have identified themselves with the invisible Taliban groups in various parts of tribal and settled areas. Certain hardened criminals of settled districts have joined various Taliban groups for the purpose of shelter, economic benefit and group synergism. Some strongly religiously intoxicated groups of Taliban don’t approve of these notorious gangsters and criminals but due to the ongoing war on terror they have welcomed them out of exigencies and as a matter of convenience. The LEAs have not worked hard to stop such criminals who could be potential terrorists in their nearby vicinity. There are a number of examples of known criminals turning terrorists, but an organizational assessment of the CTC is yet to be accomplished which could rightly predict the burgeoning ranks of terrorists.  Should the organized crime and terrorism converge in the central fulcrum of the CTC and gain political authority, the subsequent results will be either a failed state or a criminal state with no central authority or an environment of anarchy. The formulation of future counter-terrorist and anti-crime policies will significantly overlap, and continuously evolve in preparation to the changing security environment as opposed to changing in response to the changing security environment (Failure to recognize the benefits of tracing the relationship between crime and terrorism, especially in vulnerable regions such as Southeast Asia, may contribute to the rising complexity of the regional security environment. It is the failure to seek alternative ways to understand the various dimensions of threats that contributes to the age-old dilemma of the state constantly being “one step behind” (Makarenko, 2005).

 

(C)             Identification of Moral Religious Policing or Potential Terrorists

        In the miscreant-stricken areas, the local traditional justice system had been deteriorated for a long time and the socio-political reform agenda of any government never got introduction to these areas. People need justice and speedy dispensation of justice has a quick effect on the parties as well as on the general public. The Taliban of Pakistan rightly identified the reasons of success and popularity of Taliban in Afghanistan in 1996-2001 and developed their indigenous model. The model is based on simplicity, tribal bravery traits, commitment to religious tenets, historical resistance to foreign invaders, tribal revengeful nature, action against criminals, awarding of punishment to them and relief to the aggrieved party. This is known as vigilant or moral policing of the Taliban. The potential terrorists capitalized on these scoring points and very cleverly turned the local Taliban administrative set-up into a formidable force which became a challenge to the government authority in almost all of the tribal areas. When Taliban of one area got successful and received applause, welcome, and support from the general population, the spill-over effects were unstoppable in other tribal areas.  A story of success in one part had greater psychological effects on the adjacent areas, thus a cascade of uprising and challenging gangs started their own moral policing, opening new fronts for the LEAs. The LEAs have been a failure in identifying this cascade or infiltrating Talibanization (the process by which Taliban move and make advances socially, politically, religiously, psychologically or ‘militarily’). The LEAs analyst should have identified this phenomenon in its totality. Neither similarities in these areas were identified as soft ground for the increasing wave of Talibanization, nor concrete and stringent measures were taken to plug the infiltration into other areas which was not only psychological but also a request of defective operations by LEAs. More were displaced than killed and arrested. The failure to timely predict the potential terrorist activities is one of the most important reasons behind the spreading extremism in other parts of the country. The urban areas are also struck by the same wave of terrorism. We will quote two examples:

 

(i)                 Situation in Swat: District Swat was hit by an extremist religious movement, Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat (Movement for Implementation of Islamic Law) of Maulana Sufi Muhammad, in 1994. The insurgency, after resulting in numberless killing, was quelled by the military operation. The remnants were still there and the residual fighters, under the command of Sufi Muhammad crossed to Afghanistan via Bajaur Agency to fight with the American forces in 2001. Since 1994 to 2001, no ground work was done to stop this upsurge again which could be easily ignited and triggered by a happening in the next door neighbour. The son-in-law of Maulana Sufi Muhammad, Maulana Fazlullah started his own movement in District Swat with humble religious teachings and a seemingly sincere effort to resolve the local problems with honesty of intention and in the light of Islamic laws. He was allowed to gain, willingly or unwillingly, with support and popularity till the time he challenged the government with his self-styled vigilante moral policing and dispensation of justice. The dispersed terrorists found this place a safe-haven and flocked together around Maulana Fazlullah and went on to fight with the LEAs. The LEAs started their operation until very late and the laxity of such a long period of time provided Maulana Fazlullah ample of opportunity to organize, prepare and even train and dispatch suicide bombers in case of severe military operation. Resultantly, they put up a strong resistance to the LEAs. The failure to identify this movement as a potential terrorist organization or a strong ally of terrorism could not be excused by the responsible analysts of LEAs. The events of his development into a fighting force are given in Table. III

 

Table III: Military-Cum-Police Operation in Swat (Malakand Division): Leading Events

 

Nov. 9,2006

Suicide attack on Army Recruitment Centre in Dargai, Malakand, killing 42 recruits.

May 23, 2007

Maulana Fazlullah, civil administration and police strike peace accord

July 3, 2007

Rockets attack on Matta Police Station, Killing one constable + many injured

July 4,2007

Remote-controlled bomb attack on Police Lines, Mingora, killing 06 + 09 injured including District Police Officer, Swat + Maulana Fazllulah started armed patrolling in the area

July 6,2007

Attack on Police + FC convoy in Matta, 4 injured including senior police officers

July 6,2007

Attack on army convoy in Chakdara, 4 killed including senior army officers

July 12,2007

Suicide attack in Mingora killing 3 policemen + 06 civilians

July 14,2007

Militants taking control of many Government offices in Kabal and Matta.

July 15,2007

Suicide attack on Army convoy, killing 14 security forces + 20 civilians + 40 injured

July 17,2007

Religious Leaders (e.g. Qazi Hussain Ahmad) demanded withdrawal of security forces from Swat

July 27,2007

Maulana Fazllulah promised cooperation for bringing peace to the area with the grand consultative body of religious leaders (ulema)

August 1,2007

Suicide attack on parents of District Nazim, killing 3, many injured

August5-8,07

Sporadic shelling and attacks on various police stations + FC camps.

August 23,07

Pak army spokesman Major. Gen. Waheed Arshad announces that Swat will soon be freed from Fazllulah’s militants

August 26,07

Suicide attack on Police vehicle, killing 4 policemen + civilians

August 27,07

Armed clashes and firing between militants and security forces

August 31,07

Militants attack on police vehicle in Khawazakhela, injuring many police officers+ Security forces start vacating important offices including Swat Airport.

Sept. 7, 2007

Markets in divisional headquarters, Mingora attacked, destroying 50 shops.

Sept. 10, 2007

Armed militants closed down a private musical function in a hotel in Fazagut

Sept. 11-29,07

Sporadic clashes, explosions and attacks continue, killing and injuring many security forces and civilians+ Damaging Buddha statue in Jahanabad

Sept. 29, 2007

Fazllulah orders his commanders to arrest anti-social/criminal elements in Swat and be presented to him at his place in Imam Dheri

Oct. 2-12,2007

Besides clashes and explosions, Fazllulah imposed Islamic laws in certain areas, and sentenced many criminals to prison and whipping

October 19, 2007

Fazllulah announces strong resistance to any potential military operation

October 24, 2007

Fresh security forces started coming in Swat

October 25, 2007

Suicide attack on security forces near police lines, Mingora, killing 30 persons.+ 35 injured

October 26, 2007

Severe fighting between militants and security forces, resulting in many casualties

October 27, 2007

Three hundred Taliban put on fire the house of District Nazim Swat, Mr. Jamal Nasar

October 28, 2007

Gunship helicopters started shelling /bombardment on Taliban’s hideouts

October 30, 2007

Air-shelling on 70 villages which were under the control of Taliban militants.

Nov. 1, 2007

40 FC forces surrendered before Taliban + 8 others security forces surrendered

Nov. 2, 2007

Taliban releases 48 security forces in front of media

Nov. 3, 2007

Another 120 Security forces set free by Taliban. They were allowed to go home.

Nov. 2-5, 2007

Many Police stations vacated by police + FC and took over by Taliban

Nov. 7, 2007

Bahrain and Kalam were given back to the local population by Taliban

Nov. 10, 2007

07 Security forces including senior army officers arrested and made hostages by local Taliban

Nov. 12, 2007

President Musharraf announces military operations in Swat till the end of militancy and talibanization

Nov. 12, 2007

Pak Army took over the operation and Swat administration in their hands.

Nov. 13, 2007

Taliban, is now in possession of 5 out of 8 tehsils (subdivisions) of district Swat , marched towards the  adjacent district Shangla

Nov. 14, 2007

Taliban occupied District headquarters Shangla + Alpuri police station

Nov. 14, 2007

Army imposes “Curfew” in many areas; it is for the first time in the history of district Swat

Nov. 14-17,07

Clashes and gunship shelling continued. Army started recapturing and regaining the lost civil administration and government offices.

Nov.14-Dec31, 2007

In a total population of 1.5 million in district Swat, hundreds and thousands of civil people were displaced/have migrated to other areas, facing serious socio-economic problems, and even creating many problems in other areas. Refugee camps are being established in other districts by NGOs. The initial police strength in Swat was 2165 which was supported by Frontier Constabulary, Frontier Corps (2015) and Pak Army (now 15000). The total death toll for law-enforcement personnel was 68 with 157 injuries. A total of 50 civilians lost their lives and 120 got injured. 120 militants were put to death and 200 received injuries. The number for the militants’ arrest was unknown; however their potential strength was calculated as 4600 with hardcore militants (both local and foreigners) of 600-700 in district Swat.

 

(ii)       The Red Mosque Debacle: The story of Lal Masjid (Red Mosque) was carried by almost all important international media where the students and teachers of an Islamic school, Jamia Hafsa, took an assumed ‘divine duty’ of implementing the ‘word of God’ on the ‘earth of God’. Even the female students in their black clad (veil) came out to enforce the Islamic law in a way they deemed right. Their activities went on to the extent where they kidnapped a few Chinese beauty-parlor workers which caused indignation of international community and resentment from the President of Republic of China. After a long drawn psychological war and a lenient view of their moral policing by the LEAs in the capital city of Islamabad, a bloody military operation was carried out, though much belated. The facts and figures of casualties of the said operation are still shrouded in the dark. The cascade of the events of Red Mosque are shown in Table: IV which clearly indicate that the LEAs have no system of Early Warning or a Potential Terrorist Indicator System (PTIS) whereas bundle of suggestive factors and glaring indicators can be observed in the whole process of development of Red Mosque story. The LEAs must realize that without any legal authority, such naïve, self styled and irrational imposition of Islamic Laws could easily be hijacked by terrorists. This gory incident later on led to a series of suicide attacks in the country and the record of the arrested suicide bombers and terrorists’ shows that they were deeply moved by the atrocities allegedly perpetrated by the LEAs during the operation. The failure of intelligence or identification of any future eventuality in the aftermath of this incident is glaringly evident. The disconnection between tactical and strategic operators is the main obstacle in developing an ‘Early Warning System’.

 

Table IV: Red Mosque (Lal Masjid) Operation-Leading Events

 

January 2007

(Land Grabbing)

Female students armed with canes occupy a Children’s Library in Islamabad + Protests against government plans to demolish mosques/seminaries built without official permission.

February 13

 

Authorities agree to rebuild one demolished mosque in a bid to end the library standoff. Religious Affairs Minister Ijaz-ul-Haq lays brick for the new mosque.

March

(Moral Policing)

Female students abduct 3 women they accuse of running a brothel + detain 2 policemen. They are released after reportedly repenting.

March 27

(Active Taliban-style Policing)

Male and female students begin Taliban-style anti-vice patrols targeting music and video shops in Islamabad bazaars and brothels.

April 6

(Model Judiciary Suicidal Threats)        

The mosque sets up a Sharia (Islamic Law) Court + Senior cleric Maulana Abdul Aziz vows to launch thousands of suicide attacks if the government attempts to close it down.

 

April 9        

(Kangroo’s Decision)   

The Sharia Court issues a religious edict against Pakistan Tourism Minister Nilofar Bakhtiar, accusing her of committing a sin after she is shown in newspaper photographs embracing a parachuting instructor following a charity jump in France.

April 10

(Government in Action)

The government blocks the mosques illegal website and radio station.

 

May 19

(Targeting Police)

Students associated with the mosque kidnap of 4 policemen after the arrest of a dozen of mosque supporters. 2 policemen were arrested two days later. All were eventually freed. 

June 23

(Chinese Abducted)    

Dozens of students kidnap 9 people including six Chinese women and a Chinese man, from an acupuncture clinic, claiming it is a brothel. All are freed following protests from Beijing.

June 27

(Reaction from China)

China, Pakistan’s closest ally, tells Islamabad to step up its protection of Chinese workers, state press reports.

July 3

(Operation Silence?)

Escalating tensions erupt into street battles around the mosque between security forces and the militants. 16 people killed, including a soldier, a journalist, eight students and several bystanders + 150 got wounded.

July 4

(Mosque Siege)

Security forces lay siege to the mosque, demanding unconditional surrender and the release of alleged hostages, mainly small children and women. The chief Maulana Aziz is arrested sneaking out of the mosque in a female veil (burqa). His brother Ghazi Abdul Rashid takes over as mosque chief. Hundreds of students surrender but many remain inside. Shoot-on-sight curfew imposed.

July 7

(President’s Message)  

President General Pervez Musharraf says all militants will be killed if they do not lay down arms.

July 10

(Negotiations Failed)    

After negotiations fail, security forces storm the mosque. 8 Soldiers + 50 militants are killed. Chief rebel cleric Ghazi Rashid amongst dead.

July 11

(Operation Sunrise- Official recoding)

Government announces that military commandos will wipe out all militant resistance in 8-days operation + media not allowed to visit + No verified figures on civilian casualties.

July 12

(Burial Unattended)     

Local authorities bury 69 coffins filled with mutilated bodies of the civilians’ dead from the mosque battle in the darkness of night in a city graveyard, with only grave diggers and journalists as witnesses and no relatives of the dead in attendance. Officials say there were 73 people in the coffin.  Government says 248 people are injured in the whole operation. Opposition parties claim civilian death toll is in thousands, not hundreds. President General Pervez Musharraf says operation was inevitable and declares that no mosque or seminary would be allowed to be misused like the mosque and associated Jamia Hafsa.(Islamic seminary)

July 13

(Litigations in Supreme Court on Dead People) 

Supreme Court of Pakistan takes up suo-motu action on the mosque issue and the problems being faced by the residents due to the curfew imposed in the surrounding area. The Inspector General of Police, Islamabad says that from July 3 to 11, 1096 people: 628 men, 465 women and girls and 3 children had come out or had been rescued from the complex. The SC declines to entertain a request to order a judicial inquiry into conflicting reports about the number of people killed in the operation.

July 31

(Statements in Supreme

Court)

Deputy Commissioner of Islamabad stated that 662 men and 470 women were arrested in the Lal Masjid operation, out of which 604 men and 467 women had been released. According to Jamia Hafsa’s enrolment register there were 1770 registered female students, out of which 1526 were boarders. However, Maulana Abdul Aziz and his wife Umme Hassan claimed 3600 regular female students, and among them 3000 were boarders. 

Source: Daily Dawn, (International Newspaper, Jan¾July 2007) Islamabad, Pakistan.

 

(D)             Identification of Potential Breeding Houses for Terrorism

 

      “Law enforcement’s knowledge and responsiveness to local and regional issues is central to the success in war on terrorism” (Shustra et al., 2008). The law enforcement intelligence should be able to track the movements and interactions of the terrorists so that they can figure out who the terrorist organizations have targeted for recruitment.

    This will give the law enforcement agencies the opportunity of early intervention by working with parents or the schools of these potential terrorists before it is too late. In this manner, law enforcement officials could provide consultation to the potential terrorists, their families, and the schools in an effort to save them from the hands of the terrorists” (Yayla, 2007). The role of breeding houses for potential terrorists in Pakistan cannot be overemphasized. There may be a weak link between such suspected sanctuaries and the actual terrorists but a possibility of potential terrorism should not stop the LEAs from constant vigilance, intelligence and precautionary measures of early intervention. The first step in the Early Warning system is to shortlist all  such places and segments of the society which could be a soft belly or sitting ducks for the looking terrorists.

    In Pakistan, the Islamic schools are generally targeted for easy indoctrination into a commitment to the ‘holy war’ (jihad). Not all schools do the same where the poor students are given free food, free accommodation and free education but a few are to be searched and surveyed for the same reasons. Their linkage with foreign governments and associations for funding should be a question of priority. However, a proper reform agenda for their registration and modernization will bring them into the mainstream of the civilized society. Another area of concern is FATA, which is being painted as the ‘safe-haven of Al-Qaeda’. What kind of people from FATA are attracted to Al-Qaeda or Taliban and why?  Are the officers of criminal justice system competent in recognizing the Terrorist Attack Pre-Incident Indicators (TAPIs), a term used to describe actions and behaviours by terrorists before they carry out any attack? An analysis into such questions will reveal the simmering problems of poverty, ignorance, injustice, delayed-justice, non development, illiteracy and social isolation and political marginalization of these areas. By targeting the military operations and redressing the unresolved problems of terrorist breeding houses will help mitigate the chances of future generations being slipped into the hands of the terrorists. During interrogation the arrested terrorists have disclosed about the financial support to them and their families by the employing terrorists which demand a complete research on the subject. Sachs’s (2005) advice holds good:

 

Moreover, terrorism has complex and varying causes, and cannot be fought by military means alone. To fight terrorism, we will need to fight poverty and deprivation as well. A purely military approach to terrorism is doomed to fail. Just as a doctor fights disease by prescribing not only medication, but also by bolstering a person’s immune system through adequate nutrition and by encouraging a healthy lifestyle for his patient, so, too, we need to address the underlying weaknesses of the societies in which terrorism lurks; extreme poverty, mass unmet needs for jobs, incomes, and dignity; and the political and economic instability that results from degrading human conditions. If societies like Somalia, Afghanistan, and western Pakistan were healthier; terrorists could not operate so readily in their midst (Sachs, 2005).

 

(H)      Policy Implications for LEAs in Pakistan

 

(i) Intelligence-Led Policing, Coordination Amongst LEAs and Counter-Terrorism Unit:

Law enforcement is called upon to respond to threats of terrorism as well as to actual incidents and acts of terrorism. Therefore the law enforcements’ knowledge, skills and resources are reflected in its response in the different stages of terrorism incidents; before, during, and after an act of terrorism (Shusta et al., 2008). The governments devise, design and develop multi pronged strategies –tactical or strategic—which may either be immediate (short-term) or futuristic (long-term) responses. The LEAs are generally not included in the proactive approach to terrorism which is focused on the long-term solutions that deal with the social aspects of terrorism. The LEAs are expected to develop their own operational and instigative units or wings to respond to the criminal aspects of terrorism. However, given the growing complexity, severity, pervasiveness, and international aspects of terrorism, the LEAs are compelled to redefine, re-organize and re-construct their structures and functions not only to arrive at the crime scene but also to sense, predict and prevent the incident long before it happens or contain its further damage in some other places. Particularly, after 9/11 nearly all LEAs and police forces are constrained to re-think their real capabilities and competence in the new era of terrorism. White (2007) describes:

 

Departments have been forced to revise training, deployment, and communication strategies and to create counterterrorism units within their departments. Police now provide extra patrol and guard around critical infrastructures such as power plants, food and water sources, and transportation hubs. Police departments now receive briefings from federal authorities in the FBI and Homeland Security about potential threats and terrorist plans garnered through electronic surveillance and interrogations of incarcerated terrorists (White, 2007).

 

    One of the approaches developed after 9/11 is the Intelligence Led Policing (ILD), the use of criminal intelligence to guide policing, and to which we have hinted briefly in the preceding pages. Much literature is available on the subject. Unfortunately, the LEAs in Pakistan have not embraced this concept yet. The Homeland Security Department could have been taken as a model for the disparate, disjointed and independently working LEAs of Pakistan. Constitutionally, responsibility of the maintenance of law and order rests with the four provinces whereas the intelligence agencies, whether military in role and structure or semi-civilian, are controlled by the federal government, which further aggravate the situation if the opposing political parties are returned to the office with conflicting and split mandate. This often happens in Pakistan. The intelligence agencies are so strong that even the democratic forces cannot claim to have an administrative control on them. Intelligence disconnect, i.e., the failure of an agency to share intelligence information with other agencies, is one of the highest problems with the LEAs in combating terrorism in Pakistan.

    The initiatives of the Terrorism Early Warning (TEW) group, a Los Angeles based regional multi agency and multidisciplinary task force could be taken as a guideline for the federal and regional LEAs. It attempt to provide remedy for many of the problems inherent in gathering, analyzing, and sharing information amongst agencies that have unrelated missions and diverse operating styles (Birzer and Roberson 2007). Amongst the variety of theoretical and operational duties of the LEAs in combating terrorism, this paper is focused on the need and importance of a knowledge-based approach to threat assessment of potential terrorism. Threat assessment, a phrase commonly used in counterterrorism and refers to the evaluation of a potential terrorist act—whether it will happen, where it will happen, and what the expected damages or injuries would be if it happens—has become one of the major duties of Department of Homeland Security. Threat assessment measures involve investigation and analysis of situations and individuals who may pose threats to the public (Birzer & Robson, 2007). In the case of Pakistan, we have mentioned in the preceding sections how to identify potential terrorists and create a system on criminal intelligence by developing the multitude of LEAs in their dealing with the issue of terrorism. The traditional role of prevention investigation and prosecution of a criminal act and the offender now seems to be added with the brain-storming, energy demanding and intellect-consuming job of criminal intelligence, crime analysis or preventive intelligence which is the basic element of ILD. The specialists in threat analysis will pass on the credibility and potential of the threat. For the practical purpose of daily working of law enforcement officers following preliminary investigation is important:

 

  • Date and time of threat

  • Mode of receiving the threat

  • Who received?

  • Nature of act threatened

  • Potential target/victim (e.g., high-value, general crowd and site)

  • Expected weapons  (e.g., bomb, chemicals, fire, suicide jackets,)

  • Demands or grievances accompanying threat

  • Stated political, religious or sectarian organizational affiliation (Taliban, Al-Qaeda)

  • Any claim or hints of responsibility for prior terrorist threats or acts

  • Any clue or hint of relationship with other organized, white-collar crime gangs/syndicates

  • Other data, such as background noises (telephone threat, speech characteristics), handwriting identification (Taliban’s letters, selection of language, words and style)

  • Assessment of damage to person and property and demand for early protection to victim, general public and the officers personal security with an estimated demand for cooperation, preparation and collaboration of other sister agencies.

 

    The list is not complete but these are the probabilities at the first arrival of a threat and to be ready to respond as an immediate responder to terrorism. Apart from this operational preparedness, the major task with the LEAs is the identification of any potential terrorist who could be intervened socially, politically, diplomatically, religiously and economically in order to prevent him/her from shipping into the hands of actual terrorists. The ‘think-tanks’ in the LEAs have greater responsibility in this respect.

    The ILD, does not, emerge solely from the concern about terrorism but rather builds on major developments in law enforcement in the last two decades of the 20th century. These include community policing, problem-solving policing and some other promising practices like COMPSTAT of NYPD and the Project Safe Neighbourhoods (PSN) of the U.S. Department of Justice (Mc Grarrel, 2007). But a centralized unit with analysts of all intelligence agencies in Pakistan should shoulder the responsibility of collecting and analyzing the available information/data which could be disseminated to operational units for actions and political administrations for policies targeted at the causes of terrorism. The review of various reports, legal instruments and commissions (e.g., 9/11 Commission Report, the new anti-terrorism legislation in USA and UK, etc) will be the first guidelines of such an indigenous Counterterrorism Unit. This knowledge-based model should focus on the building process of international terrorist organization (Figure No. I), which if carried out by the efficient knowledge workers of high caliber and with the support of modern technologies, will result in an accumulated wisdom of all the LEAs. Such profound, meticulous and penetrating insight will be used in predicting the future trends in terrorists activities, the identification of potential terrorist groups, the potential targets and the need for modification, adaptation and overhauling of the existing law enforcement machinery.

 

   

    Since the pressure on local LEAs is so heavy, this highly sophisticated responsibility cannot be left to their existing working apparatus. Their capacity to compile and analyze the data to predict threats and potential terrorist acts is much below than the requisite task. Most of the LEAs are already too over-strained and over-worked to do this job peacefully and accurately. More funding and new technologies are needed for this purpose. Central coordination of the LEAs is recommended with a special reference to the introduction of ILD at the level of civil society where police are the first line of defence. A few officers from the various LEAs in Pakistan have, at least theoretically, suggested such a central unit, the National Counter-Terrorism Centre (NCTC), the organizational structure of which is given in Figure. II. However, the groups of designers of this unit have failed to provide any constitution/legal legitimacy for this unit and could not clearly indicate the service structure for the officers from different departments. It should have been a separate, specialized and independent unit, within the integrated framework of the presently disjointed LEAs, especially the intelligence agencies.

 

Improving The Existing Capacity of LEAs:

    Apart from the introduction of a single ‘unified’ theory of policing, and a highly advanced centre of data analysis and prediction, one should not overlook the existing capabilities of LEAs which could be harnessed, refined and channelized with a little effort of change in behaviours and proper reallocation of responsibilities and resources. The first thing is that it is important for law enforcement officers to be aware of the different stereotypes of potential terrorists. They need to change their perceptions of who the terrorists are before they can effectively detect terrorist activities (Shusta, et al., 2007). For example, (a) Not all terrorists are Arabs or Muslims, (b) Although their actions may appear insane or irrational, the terrorists are generally intelligent, rational, decisive and clear-thinking and (c) Most terrorists may be semi-trained but the training and experience of some of the terrorists render them as skillful in their craft as any law enforcement professional in the United States (Shusta, et al., 2007).

    In addition to this change in perception and in addition to the development of a knowledge-based approach to combat terrorism, the existing LEAs in Pakistan can adopt community oriented policing (COP), problem-oriented policing (POP) and COMPSTAT-all the three prominent theories, which are not incompatible and that when they are applied in concert, they achieve noticeable success. Programs for standardization in training, equipments, and processes are to be launched to remove or mitigate the variation in competency levels of official hierarchy and amongst the expected results from varying available techniques, administrative structures, quality of crime analysts and other message delivery systems (Mc Donald, 2005).

 

For this purpose, it is suggested:

  • Establishment of small intelligence units at local level district level with officers/staff reasonably qualified in making profile and reports on any potential threats (e.g. CIA in Police Rules of 1934) (Annex: A)

  • Adoption of Situational Crime Prevention strategy or environmental design  (e.g., target hardening, enhanced surveillance, increase security checks, etc)

  • Fresh recruitment and engaging ‘honest brokers’ in importing education and training on new technologies and skills for compilation and analysis of data.

  • Developing and proposing plans for early warning on the potential terrorists which should be immediately forwarded to the Central Unit for policy options and response strategies.

  • Mobilization of existing resources to the hot spots so that the intensity of the problem is reduced and its future implications and repercussions are identified and evaluated.

  • Full utilization, revitalization and modernization of separate operative units like Criminal Intelligence Department (CID) of Police Rules 1934.

  • Effective and rapid mobilization of reserved armed forces.

  • Modernization and re-deployment of paramilitary and civil armed forces like Frontier Constabulary, Frontier Corps, Levis, Khasaddar, etc along the tribal /semi-tribal borders and regions.

  • Improvement in logistic weapons and training capabilities of the LEAs.

  • Raising rapid response force with proper equipments and support from local CIA, provincial CID, local and national intelligence agencies like Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Military Intelligence (MI), Intelligence Bureau (IB) and Special Branch. 

The organizational structure of the existing agencies at federal and provincial levels is summarized in diagram IV. This needs integration of certain bigger agencies with some smaller units, both at analytical (investigative) and operational level. The arrangement doesn’t exclude the introduction and establishment of other departments/units in future. However, they all should be combined at some central level. Today, there is a ‘central vacuum’ for all of these existing agencies and departments which should be filled with a national homeland security apparatus. It needs new legislation, new vision and a firm commitment. Today, they all are operating independently and separately with intelligence-disconnect. The new apparatus will reduce the chances of error, overlapping, overlooking and remove the difficulties of academic and operational capabilities.

 

Reforms in Actual/Potential Breeding Houses:

    This is a very important subject and includes all kinds of social, political, religious institutional and economic reforms in the tribal belt, the FATA and other under-developed areas and segments throughout the country. This is the topic of a separate paper. However, briefly, we can say that in political reforms, Pakistan needs strong democratic institutions, fully developed on the basis of fair play, transparency, justice, equality, rule of law and civil liberties. The tribal areas should be brought to the mainstream political life through proper presentations on all political forums and the traditional legal tribal administration should be gradually changed with modern democratic values, mechanisms and institutions and with full realization of fundamental human rights for men and women alike. This will obviously take time and definitely needs the support and confidence of the people in the area. Before the full-blown political and administrative reforms we need comprehensive educational and social reforms in the area through ‘education for all’ policies with technical /vocational training and through a policy of openness, cultural diffusion and steady introduction of modern technologies and their benefits.

    The international community has given unbelievable aid to different NGOs for this purpose but honestly speaking the NGOs are not trusted by the local people and they regard them as ‘agents of the foreign hands’. All this should be done through honest government officials and in an auditable and accountable mechanism of transaction. About the religious reforms, we need to have full concentration on the curriculum, methods of teaching, selection of students, their living and their processes of socialization/indoctrination in the Islamic schools called Madrassahs. An acceptable law and meaningful rules and regulations are required for this purpose. Alternative educational facility and good opportunities of training, accommodation and future prospects will ultimately reduce the demands for Madrassahs’ admissions by the poor people of the tribal areas. It is the free food and free accommodation that serve as an incentive for the poor people to send their kids to these Islamic schools, rather than an assumed divine duty to learn an engineered curriculum with no practical education. The reforms in LEAs is also a big issue and unfortunately, the judicial, legal and police reforms under the foreign—funded Access to Justice Programme (AJP) are still not fully realized. We need some more advance changes in the LEAs, and their integration through administrative and legally protected reforms. The economic development in the tribal areas is a long awaited dream. The recently announced 750 million dollars US aid is subject to lengthy procedures and scrutiny. We have to wait and see the results of this aid as there are many transactional and implementation difficulties in the utilization and disbursement of all such international aid. We need an atmosphere of procedural fairness, mutual trust and honesty of intention and commitment.

 

References

Birzer, L. M., & Roberson, C. (2007). Policing Today and Tomorrow. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Maguire, M., & Tim J. (2007). Criminal Intelligence and the National Intelligence Model. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson and A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Investigation (pp. 199-225). Cullompton: Willan.

Makarenko, T. (2003). The Ties that Bind: Uncovering the Relationship between Organized Crime and terrorism. In D. Siegel, H. Bunt, & D. Zaitch (Eds.), Global Organized Crime: Trends and Developments. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Makarenko, T. (2005). Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime: Tracing the Crime-Terror Nexus in Southeast Asia. In P. J. Smith (Ed.), Terrorism and Violence in Southeast Asia.  New Delhi, India: Pentagon Press.

Martin, G. (Ed.), (2004). The new era of terrorism: selected readings. Imprint, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Mc Donald, P. P. (2005). Information Technology and Crime Analysis. In D. Pattavina (Ed.), Information. Technology and the Criminal Justice System (pp. 125-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

McGrarrell, F. E. (2007). Intelligence Led Policing as a Framework for law Enforcement in the 21st Century. In H. Durmaz, B. Sevinc, A. S. Yayla, & S. Ekici (Eds.), Understanding and Responding to Terrorism (pp. 221-235). (NATO security through Science Series, E: Human and Societal Dynamics-Vol. 19). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.

Oliverio, A., & Lauderdale, P. (Eds.), (2005), Terrorism: A New Testament. London: Sage UK and ON, Canada: de Sitter Publications.

Sachs, J. (2005). The end of poverty: how we can make it happen in our lifetime. London, UK: Penguin Books.

Schmalleger, F. (2008). Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction. 7th Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

_____________(2007): Criminal Justice Today. Ninth Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

____________ (2007): Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st century. Ninth Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

____________ (2006): Criminology Today, An Integrative Introduction, Fourth Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Shusta, M. R., Levine, D. R., Wong, H. Z., Oslon, A. T., & Harris, P. R. (2008): Multicultural Law Enforcement, Fourth Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Simonsen, C. E., & Spindlove, J. R. (2006). Terrorism Today: The Past, the Players, the Future. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

The DAWN (International Newspaper): Islamabad (www.DAWN.com)

The News (International Newspaper): Feb: 6, 2008 Islamabad (www.thenews.com.pk)

Weston, B. P., & Lushbaugh, A. C. (2006). Criminal Investigation, Basic Perspectives, Tenth Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

White, D. M. (2007). Current Issues and Controversies in Policing, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Yalya, A. S., (2007). Terrorism as a Social and Criminal Phenomenon: A Complete Model to Deal with Terrorism. In H. Durmaz, B. Sevinc, A. S. Yayla, & S. Ekici (Eds.), Understanding and Responding to Terrorism (pp. 185-206). (NATO security through Science Series, E: Human and Societal Dynamics-Vol. 19). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.


[1] Director, Research and Development, NWFP Police (Pakistan Police Service) and President, Pakistan Society of Criminology, Office# 261, 3rd Floor, Deans Trade Center, Peshawar Saddar, Peshawar, NWFP (Pakistan).

Email: fasih68@hotmail.com, pscatpeshawar@yahoo.com

INternational Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences

Vol 3 Issue 2 july- december 2008

2008.Creative Commons BY-NC-SA International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences unless otherwise noted.

© 2008  International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences. All rights reserved

Web Journal created, published and maintained by Dr. K. Jaishankar Last updated 02/10/2009